Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
How Fossil Fuels Helped A Chemist Launch The Plastic Industry[2016/10/24]
-
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Users Haunted By New Battery Issue: How To Fix It[2016/09/23]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Replacement Still Problematic? Users Complain Over New Battery Issues[2016/09/26]
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
Plastic ban in voters' hands[2016/10/24]